Welcome Page | Weblog Home | Website Index
July 20, 2002
Roots, With or Without MSG

As discussed in the post below on roots of the world, I've been thinking about a set of Root Estates to use instead of Earth, Air, Fire and Water, something that hasn't been used in games or, ideally, mysticism, but that seems systematic and comprehensive. The candidate set should be rich in associations and symbolism, yet as concrete as possible. The question is what concept could meet those requirements.

The answer is on the tip of your tongue, and the middle, and the back. The Root Estates are the taste sensations:

Saltiness
Bitterness
Sweetness
Sourness

Saltiness is as real as water. Sweetness is tangible as earth. They mean things. At the same time, they suggest things. "He's a salty character." "She has a sour disposition." "These are bitter times." Certainly you could design an entire roleplaying game with these as attributes. It's easy enough to plausibly overlay the tastes on the seasons: Summer is sweet; Winter is bitter. If Summer is sweet, then autumn is when things sour. Spring is salty? Spring is the season of water and new life. Saltiness is the taste of the sea, source of life. Or maybe you prefer to associate Salt with summer, season of sweat, and sweetness with fecund spring.

The Spirit World section of the Great White Book (p. 36) tells us that "the immediate vicinity of each root attaches to an Age of the World. The game takes place during the Third Age, the Age of Pain. That pretty clearly attaches to the Bitter Root. The Second Age, dominated by the consequences of The Fall, would be Sour.

The First Age is a bit tricky. I associate it with Salt because of its newness and its mingling of joy and pain. The First Age is the soup out of which the concepts we live by will come. That makes the Fourth Age the prize to be eyed, as it will be the Sweet Epoch.

Salty, Bitter, Sour and Sweet. That's the way we learned it in school. Turns out, though, that this system too has a Fifth Element, and for symmetry's sake it comes from China.

Umami is the taste of glutamates, such as, yes, MSG. This turns out to be primary - that is, it has specific tongue receptors and the perception of it can not be duplicated by any combination of the other four taste elements.

So claims this article, anyway, in which food editors sample chicken stock flavored each with one of the five taste sensations. You hate to see a good fourfold system complicated by reality. I find myself tempted to grasp at

Thirty-eight percent of the editors mistakenly identified the salt-only chicken stock as the one containing MSG. Although many people have the misperception that MSG makes food taste saltier, MSG contains only one-third the amount of sodium as table salt

Hey, how can it be a misperception, I wonder.

A problem for the Western HG to overcome is that, since umami is a new concept outside of Asia, we haven't developed a set of associations for it yet. What would it mean to say, "You're an umami little boy" instead of "You're a sweet little boy." But umami is a taste, and therefore real. And the Family Haven article offers some insight:

In terms of taste preferences, however, 75 percent of the editors indicated they preferred the broth with the UMAMI flavor contributed by glutamate. They described the taste as "rich," "well-rounded," "savory," "full-bodied," "brothy," and "more chicken-like."

Kind of earthy, is one way of putting it.

So it depends whether you want four roots or five. (I haven't decided for our campaign yet.) There does seem to be a major conceptual gain in adding an Umami Root to the other four.

Posted by supplanter at July 20, 2002 03:29 PM
Comments

Well, it would add (ahem) flavor to the game for you to decide on it being four, since one of Tim's bonds is Chinese food and a personal project is to find some half-decend Dim Sum, he'll believe that it should be five.

now that would be a very umami thing to do, isn't it?

Posted by: Mike on July 21, 2002 02:08 AM

I've seen the Umami taste referred to simply as tasty.

So we could be preparing for the advent of the Tasty age.

I wonder where alcohol fits in with this cosmology, though? Is it a combination of Sweet and Sour (since the sugar has turned into alcohol)?

Posted by: Bill on July 22, 2002 10:50 AM

I've seen it referred to as tasty as well, but I think that was for us ignorant westerns. the more pretentious food people then co-opted one of the asian terms for it.

as to flavors of the alcohol, wouldn't it depend on the particular beverage? i know next to nothing, since I rarely drink, but I know Manachevitz is particularly sweet. and some beers are bitter, are they not?

Posted by: Mike on July 22, 2002 02:37 PM

I think it's a bad cosmology if different alcohols are different tastes in this sense.

An important thing about the traditional elements is how things fit into them fairly consistently. All kinds of rock fit into Earth. All kinds of alcohol fit into Air.

Posted by: Bill on July 22, 2002 03:54 PM

er... Water, that is.

Posted by: Bill on July 22, 2002 04:50 PM

I just wanted to note that I love this, and that it's a prime example of the category "wonderful and suitable ideas I'd never have thought of".

Posted by: Bruce Baugh on July 25, 2002 04:04 AM

A tasty world begs the question, "who's eating it?"

Posted by: Gar on July 25, 2002 05:02 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?



Welcome Page | Weblog Home | Website Index
Nature by Alphonse Mucha